Amish guilty of hate crime
in beard cutting attacks
in beard cutting attacks
Friday Sep 21, 2012
Members of the Amish community enter the US Federal Courthouse in Cleveland, Ohio. Photo / AP |
An Amish bishop and 15 followers
were convicted in the US state of Ohio of hate crime charges Thursday for a
series of beard-cutting attacks against those they deemed had strayed from the
faith.
Federal prosecutors argued that
Samuel Mullet - who considered himself a god and above the law - unleashed a
band of renegades who waged a "campaign of terror" against nine
religious enemies and estranged family members last year.
"The evidence was that they
invaded their homes, physically attacked these people and sheared them almost
like animals," said US Attorney Steven Dettelbach.
"Our community and our nation
must have zero tolerance for this type of religious intolerance."
The four separate raids were mainly
carried out at night, with the victims forced out of bed, their beards and hair
chopped off with horse mane shears and battery-powered clippers, and the
roughshod barber work documented with embarrassing snapshots on a disposable
camera.
Beards and long hair are sacred
symbols of an Amish follower's devotion to God, and to cut them is humiliating.
Defense lawyers argued that the
beard-cutting forays never reached the level of a hate crime - for conviction,
a religious motive and bodily injury, including disfigurement, must be proven.
They argued that love and
compassion drove the hair-cutting conflicts, which were intended to compel the
victims to return to a conservative Amish lifestyle.
Mullet, 66, was the religious and
social leader of a breakaway settlement of 18 families in Bergholz, a pastoral
farming community of rolling hills and valleys located about 100 miles (160
kilometers) from Cleveland.
The father of 18 children, and a
multi-millionaire, Mullet was charged with ordering the beard-cutting attacks,
but not accused of participating in them.
Among those convicted of conspiracy
and federal hate crime charges - which carry a minimum of 17 years behind bars
- were three of Mullet's sons.
Mullet's lawyer said he was shocked
by the verdicts.
"There was very little, in
fact no evidence connecting Sam Mullet to any of these matters," said defense
attorney Edward Bryan.
"The government was successful
in convincing the jury that he had a Svengali-like influence over these
people."
The case attracted widespread media
attention, providing a curious public a rare window into the historically
reclusive and peaceful Amish society.
For three weeks, the staid
courthouse acquired the atmosphere of an Amish communal dining hall, with 16
bearded men and bonneted women seated alongside 16 separate defense lawyers at
five tables spread across half of the courtroom.
The gallery was typically filled
with Amish observers gathered for the spectacle - the men clad in denim and
suspenders, the women in aprons and dresses. Supporters of the prosecution sat
on one side of the aisle, supporters of the Bergholz clan on the other.
Witnesses portrayed Mullet as a
fire-and-brimstone preacher and iron-fisted autocrat who imposed strict and
often bizarre discipline on his flock of 18 families. Several labeled the group
a cult.
Mullet read and censored all ingoing and outgoing mail, punished
wrongdoers with spanking and confinement in chicken coops, and had sex with
several of the young married women under the guise of marital counseling and
absolution.
More in the nzherald
Peter’s Piece
One can only
trust that the court will persuade the Ohio Amish of the error of their ways.
But religious
zealotry is not confined to the Amish. It is standard practice in many religions
to use intimidation, punishment, shame and even physical force in doing ‘God’s
work.’
Some religious
leaders seem to believe that they are above the law and their followers should
not complain about their treatment, however vile it may be.
In most
democracies the citizens can have an input into the law-making process and can
even visit the legislature and witness the enactment of new laws, or the repeal
of old laws.
But no one can
honestly say that they have made submissions to God on God’s laws, or that they
have witnessed God enacting any laws, and God help us if lawyers ever get into
the business of advising on God’s laws.