Monday, July 30, 2012

CAMPING BATTLE LINES DRAWN DOWNUNDER


New Bylaws threaten freedom

 
camping in New Zealand
by Peter Blakeborough
The writer's motorhome Wandering Wheels
camped at Lake Karapiro, New Zealand
Motor-home enthusiasts in New Zealand are gearing up for a battle with district councils in a determined bid to defend their right to freedom camp, in fully self-contained motor-homes, at the country’s beauty spots. Their organization, the New Zealand Motorcaravan Association with 44,000 members, is leading the charge.

New Zealand has an abundance of secluded and scenic places ideal for freedom camping and the NZMCA and its members are mindful of their responsibility to treat these areas with respect. ‘Leave only footprints and take only photos’ is a motto often heard in New Zealand motor-home circles.

The NZMCA believes that the Freedom Camping Act 2011 is being misinterpreted, or ignored, by some cities and district councils and they are prepared to fight in the courts to uphold the rights of their members to camp in any place that does not constitute a danger or nuisance to other people or the environment. The Freedom Camping Act regards freedom camping as a legitimate activity in all parks and public areas unless there is good reason for restricting it.

The Act and other legislation prohibits councils from introducing bylaws that protect local businesses from competition or loss of business. But some councils ignore this law and create bylaws that compel campers to go to commercial motor camps. It’s like outlawing home-baked bread to support bakeries.

Under the Freedom Camping Act councils are required to display signage in all areas where their bylaws prohibit camping and they cannot have a blanket ban over an entire council district. But some councils have responded by permitting limited motor-home parking in unattractive or undesirable places and banning it everywhere else. In the Thames-Coromandel District Council area a total of six car parking spaces have been provided in towns and freedom camping is prohibited everywhere else in the large rural and scenic district.


Camping can be enhanced with

great reads 
from

PO Box 110, Ngatea 3541, New Zealand

The NZMCA and its members are strong supporters of fully self-contained motor-homes and the association is the official authority for issuing self-containment certificates. The rules for self-containment require, among other things, three days of fresh water and waste for each person the vehicle is licensed to carry.

But some councils are aggressively targeting motor-homers with instant fines for parking at night in the same areas where cars can legitimately park without restriction.

“All we ask is that the bylaws are a fair and reasonable application of the Freedom Camping Act,” acting NZMCA general manager Pete Jenkins was quoted as saying in the Association’ Motor Caravanner magazine.

The NZMCA was founded in 1956 by Andy and Gladys Anderson and is New Zealand’s largest camping and motor caravanning organization. The association website can be visited at:


Sunday, July 29, 2012

QUEENSLAND RAIL


Australian rail firm shines light on privatization
By Greg Ansley New Zealand Herald
5:30 AM Saturday Jul 28, 2012


Photo / Thinkstock
As New Zealand bosses and workers at state-owned firms, prospective institutional investors and mum and dad punters get ready for the great asset sell-down, across the Tasman Sea in Australia rail company QR National is shining a light on the pitfalls and pay-dirt.
This week Australia's biggest rail freight operator, QR National, was in court, hammering out the industrial legacy of its switch from state to private ownership.
The Queensland company wants to cut more than 500 jobs, adding to 600 shed last year as part of a top-to-bottom overhaul of operations that chief executive Lance Hockridge said was needed to rid QR National of an inheritance of bureaucracy and excessive overheads.
As company negotiators went back to the table with unions, QR National was locking in new deals against the background of China's slowing economy, forecasts of an end to the mining boom, rising costs and domestic uncertainties.
In the past few weeks QR National has signed a 10-year contract to haul export coal from Cockatoo Coal's central Queensland mines, agreed to work with Indian-owned Adani Mining on a new line out of the coal-rich Galilee Basin, and will test the feasibility of building an independent railway with Atlas Iron in Western Australia.
Another major test lies ahead: the promised sale of the 34 per cent stake still held by the state Government some time after QR National announces its 2011-12 results late next month, a package worth almost A$3 billion ($3.9 billion) and potentially one of the biggest capital offerings of the year.
While the new state Liberal National Party Government elected in March has reversed its earlier opposition to the privatization of QR National, the timing has yet to be announced.
Premier Campbell Newman said when he took office that the Government's holding would be sold only when it could realize the best price. Although still well above IPO levels, QR National shares have eased from a peak of more than A$3.50 to A$3.14 on Thursday.
The sale will be used to help retire state debt of about A$62 billion.
Yet when the former Labor Government announced its plans to split the state-owned rail carrier into two divisions, keeping ownership of passenger operations and selling freight as a separate new company, many investors viewed it as flogging tarnished silver.
And the timing of a November 2010 float added to forecasts of doom: economic storms were still lashing the world, memories of Telstra losses scarred the mum-and-dad investors QR National hoped to attract, the market was suspicious of IPOs, and the failure of the Myer float circled like an albatross.
Warnings of future debt scared others. The company was committed to a A$3.75 billion capital building program and borrowings of A$2.4 billion, which a consortium of big mining companies led by BHP Billiton and Xstrata claimed would overstretch a privatized QR National.
The consortium's later A$5.1 billion offer for the company was declined.
Analysts and fund managers also warned that the terms of the float were unfair to retail investors, that the company was overvalued, its float was priced on growth estimates two years out when massive new debt would have been raised, and that more global turmoil lay ahead.
Billionaire miner Clive Palmer said he wouldn't touch the stock with a barge pole.
There was also brand awareness.
While other big IPOs had national recognition, QR National was almost unknown outside Queensland, forcing the launch of a A$15 million national marketing campaign.
And, politically, the knives were out.
Former Premier Anna Bligh's Government was in terminal decline and her decision to sell QR National as part of a A$14 billion privatization program to shed debt and regain Queensland's AAA rating triggered outrage.
The plan was lashed by the LNP despite its own policies of privatization, unions protested in the streets, voters abandoned Labor and party members quit in droves.

Invest in knowledge and leisure
PO Box 110, Ngatea 3541, New Zealand

But there were powerful underlying strengths, recognized abroad if not at home.
QR National is the nation's largest rail freight hauler with about A$12 billion in assets, 2600km of track and 746 locomotives and, outside Queensland's massive coalfields, carts bulk haulage in Western Australia and containers down the eastern seaboard.
And while doubts are emerging about Asian demand, resources will remain a massive powerhouse of the Australian economy.
On November 22, 2010, this was put to the test. QR National was floated at A$2.55 a share, discounted to A$2.45 for retail investors with a loyalty bonus and priority given to Queenslanders.
The float defied the gloomsayers, closing up 4 per cent on the first day. It failed to excite local institutions and retail investors, who bought a far lower than hoped 34 per cent of the shares on offer.
But heavy interest came from overseas investors, led by London-based hedge fund The Children's Investment Fund Management, which bought a 6.1 per cent stake.
Locals bought about half of the institutional allocation, although they have since increased their holdings: this month NAB spent A$414.9 million on a 126.4-million-share package.
By April last year retail investors had seen a return of almost 40 per cent and by the end of June QR National's 2010-11 annual report said its market capitalization had grown to more than A$8 billion, placing it among Australia's 50 largest listed organizations.

Peter’s Comment

Talk of shares for mum and dad investors in this part of the world always brings forth the loudest of the gloomsayers.

The gloomsayers play on the fact that many mums and dads have little understanding of share markets and would rather not know. They were raised to belief that spare cash should go into residential property, or just be left in the bank, and that only millionaires can afford to invest in shares.

Dealing with the last point first, shares can be purchased for less than the cost of a house, car, or overseas holiday and even less than the amount required to get the best interest rate at the bank.

Far too many people get their knowledge of share markets from people with little or no experience of shares. They sometimes also listen to people who did invest but made classic mistakes.

The share market is complex and people should get professional advice and proceed cautiously. A golden rule is never invest in one company only. A nest egg of $5,000 to $10,000 would be better spread over four or five companies. The brokerage fees will be a bit higher but that won’t matter to an investor in for the long haul.

Another classic mistake is ignoring market cycles when trading. Too many new investors buy shares in the euphoric but dying days of a long boom period and panic sell at a loss when the market correction takes place.

Finally, when a share is selling for less than you paid for it, you only lose if you sell.

Saturday, July 28, 2012

VICTIM OR OFFENDER?


McVicar in smash with defense lawyer
7:38 AM Saturday Jul 28, 2012
Garth McVicar

A New Zealand defense lawyer has been involved in a car smash with the head of a lobby group for victims' rights.
New Zealand Sensible Sentencing Trust founder Garth McVicar was on his way to a meeting with Kylee Guy, the widow of slain farmer Scott Guy.
But his vehicle and the one driven by lawyer Nigel Hewat collided. Mr Hewat walked away from the accident scene on Thursday night.
Mr Hewat, who defended child-killer Jules Mikus at his trial for the kidnap, rape and murder of Napier schoolgirl Teresa Cormack, said he was involved in the crash but refused to comment on what happened.
Mikus had previous convictions for sex attacks and is one of many repeat offenders highlighted by the Sensible Sentencing Trust in its campaign for tougher sentences, bail laws and victims' rights.
Mr McVicar said he was travelling about 100km/h when the crash happened.
"It was dark and drizzling. There was traffic coming towards me and all of a sudden one car pulled out of that traffic and was coming towards me. It looked like he was passing," he told the Weekend Herald.
"There wasn't enough room for all of us on the road, so I moved over. There was a cyclist alongside me on my left so I couldn't move over too far without bowling her.
"I was concentrating on not hitting the cyclist and then next minute there was a thump."
Mr Hewat allegedly went to turn right down a side road when the cars collided.

For the pleasure of great reading

"He turned into my driver's door and shunted me off the road. I was busy trying to dodge a concrete power pole.
"I was spinning out of control by that stage ... I spun around and hit a wooden pole on the other side of the road and broke that and brought the wires down."
He had only just passed the cyclist, Colette Cregan, who had been working in a Napier cafe.
Mr McVicar was able to get out of his car, which was written off, to see if anyone was injured.
"I rushed over to the other guy's car and he was gone. I looked around and there was a person sitting on the grass. That turned out to be the cyclist. I asked her if she knew where the other person was and she said, 'Yeah, he's ... down the road."'
A group of men caught up in the crash when a powerline landed on their van offered to drive Mr McVicar to find Mr Hewat.
They soon spotted him down a side road and Mr McVicar approached him.
"I said, 'Are you okay? Were you driving that car back there?' and he said yes. I said, 'Look, you better come back because there's power wires down and we don't know if anyone's hurt."'
Mr Hewat identified himself and handed over his business card.
Police said an investigation was continuing. They refused to speculate on the cause of the accident.
A spokeswoman said no decision had been made regarding charges.
Ms Cregan, 30, said: "It was quite shocking, I got a bit of a fright, I just couldn't believe what nearly happened."
She added: "I just saw the car coming towards me ... then I saw it crash into the other one. I went left and just biked as fast as I could, jumped off the bike and ran into the grass. Then I saw the lines go down and I just ran."
Ms Cregan, who is Irish and due to leave New Zealand in two weeks after a working holiday, said after the crash Mr Hewat came up and asked her if she was okay. He then asked for directions before walking away.
She left before speaking to police as she was shaken.
"I probably should have stayed ... but I just couldn't believe it happened. I was very, very lucky."

Peter’s Comment

So now the man who advocates for tougher sentencing may now be wondering if he will face some kind of sentence. If he isn’t wondering, he should be, because these things can go either way.

A victim can just as easily become an offender and an offender can become a victim. Justice is never entirely fair or just. Victims and offenders alike are rarely satisfied with the outcome of court proceedings. So what is the answer?

It is not tougher penalties. Longer prison terms only lead to more anger and a reduced chance of rehabilitation after release.

Serious road crashes happen all too frequently and they can happen to anyone and usually when they least expect them to happen. However, one thing should be clear; incompetence is a primary cause in most accidents while criminal intent is almost non-existent.

But the police will be on the scene at any accident site to see if someone can be charged with an offence rather than to see what they can do to improve the competence of drivers. And why do the police have that approach? Because people like Garth McVicar have demanded it.

So, while I sympathize with Mr McVicar with regard to his unfortunate mishap and sincerely hope that he will not be charged, I do believe it is a golden opportunity for him to reflect on his campaign for tougher sentences.

Tuesday, July 24, 2012

DON'T GET HOOKED BY THIS SCAM


Would the real Melissa Johnson please stand up
From Fiona Mackenzie's blog   http://fionamackenzie.com.au/

Posted on 08 March 2012. Tags: Scam

Our popular friend, Ms Melissa Johnson, has turned up yet again. (We first met Mel at “My home wealth system” scam.)
So you know the drill when it comes to these things.
We stumble across an obviously dubious get rich quick scheme and need to decide – is it legit or a scam?
So far we have profiled the following little rippers:
·         Home Income Cash System (Verdict: Scam)
·         My Home Wealth System (Verdict: Scam)
·         Automated Home Profits (Verdict: Scam)
New mum, cute baby (and we know from previous scams that she’s appeared in a great many locations, not just Melbourne…. but I digress).
So let’s take a look at the Online Career Package.
(By the way, here is a screenshot of the website just in case it gets taken down as has happened to some of the others that have preceded it.)
The Internet is abuzz with people wanting to know: Is Online Career Package Legit Or A Scam?
I’m calling the Online Career Package a SCAM for these reasons:
1. Melissa Johnson is too cute by half. We’ve met her (and Kelly Richards) before. Same scam, different title.
2. Read the fine print (it’s here on the home page). “Photos used in this advertisement are not of the actual testimonial individuals and personal earnings claims of any type are strictly against our policy. Any results shown should be considered exceptional, as results will vary according to each individual’s own effort and commitment.”
In other words, the testimonials are FAKE by their own admission, let alone any financial results that the testimonials claim. Furthermore, if you hand over your credit card then find out that actually there is NO money to be made, don’t claim them. There in the fine print they told you that it was exceptional (in other words, uncommon) to make money from this scheme.
3. The website displays the logos of major Internet brands. This is always a giveaway especially when there is NO DISCLOSURE of those brands association or relationship with a money-making scheme.
In fact, you can be 99% certain that there is NO relationship other than the website has used their logos without written permission to confer an authority that the website doesn’t legitimately have in its own right.
And you gotta love the fine print. Bless their cotton socks if they are good enough to tell you that they don’t own the logos. “All trademarks, logos, and service marks (collectively the “Trademarks”) displayed, are registered and/or unregistered Trademarks of their respective owners.”
4. After a hunt around, I’m still at a loss to uncover the terms and conditions of the offer, so that is a BIG red flag.
If you’re smart, you’ll Google these schemes BEFORE you hand over any of your hard-earned cash. If you don’t google it, I guess you’ll learn the hard way.

Peter's Comment

Melissa Johnson has also been shown on these websites as being from Auckland, New Zealand. I think she is a fraud, if she exists at all.

A FREE FALLING HUMAN SPACESHIP


Skydiver Felix Baumgartner to Jump From Edge of Space

Felix Baumgartner preparing to launch
himself as a human spaceship over
the Mojave Desert on a test run

By GINA SUNSERI
ROSWELL, New Mexico, July 23, 2012
It seems appropriate that Roswell, ground zero for UFO hunters, is hosting the mission to the edge of space -- because the sight of daredevilFelix Baumgartner diving back to Earth this morning from 90 thousand feet will certainly spark new UFO conspiracy theories.
Baumgartner will go from zero to perhaps 509 mph in 30 seconds when he steps out of his space capsule Tuesday morning. He hit 365 mph when he jumped from 71,000 feet in March -- and he will go supersonic in August when he dives from 120 thousand feet. That's zero to 690 mph in 25 seconds -- a human body breaking the sound barrier without an airplane. Most people go to the edge of space or beyond in a rocket -- Baumgartner is going up in a capsule carried aloft by a huge helium balloon.
Most of us would never willingly step out of an airplane to skydive from 3,000 feet. So you have to wonder why Felix Baumgartner does this. He knows the risks and says he accepts the danger. He canceled an attempt this morning because of high winds.
"The pressure is huge, and we not only have to endure but excel," he said. "We're excellently prepared, but it's never going to be a fun day, I'm risking my life, after all."
Red Bull is financing this daredevil skydive from space. The mission is named Stratos. Five years of planning by a team of experts, many volunteering their services, to break several records in one breathtaking plunge back to Earth:
Description: http://a.abcnews.com/images/site/img_bullet_bluedot.gif First person to break the sound barrier outside of an aircraft.
Description: http://a.abcnews.com/images/site/img_bullet_bluedot.gif Record for freefall from the highest altitude
Description: http://a.abcnews.com/images/site/img_bullet_bluedot.gif Longest freefall time –expected five minutes 35 seconds.
Description: http://a.abcnews.com/images/site/img_bullet_bluedot.gif Highest manned balloon flight.
This daredevil dive from near space is not a first. The Austrian Baumgartner will be breaking a 52-year-old record, and he wisely recruited the man who set the record, the legendary Col. Joe Kittinger, for advice. On Aug. 16, 1960, Kittinger jumped from a balloon at an altitude of 102,900 feet -- and fell for almost five minutes before opening a parachute to slow his descent at 18,000 feet. He made history for the highest balloon ascent, the highest parachute jump, and the fastest speed by a human being through the atmosphere. '
"Somebody will beat them someday, but when they do it, they'll be doing it to beat a record," Kittinger said in a 2008 interview with ABC's Jonathan Karl. "We didn't make those records at the time just for that purpose"
He now says he is happy to cede his record to Baumgartner -- but joked, "I told him if he changes his mind, I am ready to take over for him."
Dr. Jonathan Clark, a former NASA flight surgeon now with the National Space Biomedical Research Institute, heads the medical team monitoring Baumgartner's jump, ready to respond in an emergency. "We have run hours of tests in vacuum chambers, we are finessing life support systems, and monitoring his systems during the dive, calculating what he will need during the plunge back to Earth to survive," he said.
It is dangerous. Every member of the team acknowledges the risks. Clark said he can tick them off in his sleep: the near-vacuum of space, extreme cold, temperature fluctuations, the danger of an uncontrolled flat spin, drogue chute failure, spacesuit puncture, life support systems failure.
Is this a stunt? Clark scoffs at the suggestion. It is a scientific endeavor for him. His wife Laurel was one of the seven astronauts on the space shuttle Columbia when it broke up over Texas in 2003. A spacesuit like the one designed for this mission he said, might have saved her life.
"What the Red Bull Stratos does for me in some way is justify the loss of the of the Columbia crew," said Clark, "because it has pushed us to say we will never give up, we will always try to bring an un-survivable situation into a survivable realm. So for me this is personally important. It could lead to better crew escape systems. "
Weather is critical because the massive balloon is fragile and tears easily; it can't launch with winds in excess of 4 mph or under heavy cloud cover. Meteorologist Don Day also needs to consider where winds will push Baumgartner when he lands -- preferably not in the mountains west of the launch site.

Monday, July 23, 2012

DON'T TAMPER WITH A TAMPA AMBULANCE


Tampa Man Steals Ambulance, 
Tries To Drive Self To Hospital For Treatment



TAMPA, Fla. (CBS Tampa) – When it came to getting medical attention, stealing an ambulance and driving it to the hospital wasn’t such a bad idea at the time for one Tampa man.
Hubert Lee Credit, 39, was arrested last night after he stole an ambulance and drove himself to the hospital for treatment for injuries from what Credit claims to have been an earlier altercation with four men.
At around 10:30 p.m. Thursday, Transcare Ambulance responded to a medical call. As ambulance personnel were responding to a patient, Credit started up the ambulance and began to drive off, with the emergency lights activated, according to Tampa Police. A GPS unit was able to track where the ambulance was heading. About five minutes after the incident began, police were able to stop the ambulance at N. Tampa St. and E. 26th Ave., according to Tampa Police.
Credit explained to police that he had gotten into an altercation earlier and needed medical attention, thus his reasoning for driving off in the ambulance toward the hospital. When Credit was arrested, there was a noticeable puncture wound to his head.
“I got beat up by four guys,” Credit said, according to Tampa Police. “I saw the ambulance and I was going to drive myself to the hospital.”
Shortly thereafter, he was transported to Tampa General Hospital for treatment.
Credit has been charged with auto burglary and grand theft auto. He remains in jail on $4,000 bond, according to the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office.
Peter’s Comment
Obviously, it doesn’t pay to tamper with a Tampa ambulance. Apparently H L Credit has now changed his name to D I S Credit. 

Sunday, July 22, 2012

CONVICTING THE INNOCENT


The right to silence looked at in New Zealand
By Kate Shuttleworth New Zealand Herald
5:30 AM Sunday Jul 22, 2012
Gil Elliott, Garth McVicar and Greg King
at the Hot Tub debate at Victoria University

Photo Kate Shuttleworth

He helped Ewen Macdonald get off a murder charge by not putting him on the witness stand, but top criminal defense lawyer Greg King can see an accused's right to silence one day coming to an end.
King was involved in a panel discussion at Victoria University's law faculty on Friday evening, discussing legal procedures with Sensible Sentencing Trust chairman Garth McVicar and Gil Elliott, the father of murdered Dunedin university student Sophie Elliott.
On the contentious issue of an accused's right to silence, King conceded the rules might one day change.
He defended Macdonald's not taking the stand in the recent high-profile Scott Guy murder trial, saying he had answered every question in a 40-hour police interview, giving the jury plenty of time to see his version of events.
But he said there was a contradiction in the system when people charged with fraud could have their right to silence removed.
"If your right to silence can be taken away from you because of benefit fraud, and you're being investigated in a murder charge ... why do you have it there?" King asked
He suggested one option in the future might be allowing the prosecution to apply to a judge for an order to make it compulsory for an offender to take the stand if it was considered vital enough.
McVicar said the right to silence created an "offender-friendly, criminal-centered legal process".
"I don't think Greg needed to rely on the right to silence in his last case [the Guy trial] - he'd already proven that a doubt existed."
But McVicar said New Zealand should follow the UK's lead in getting rid of the offender's right to silence.
"It appears our legal system is not about truth - if it was the right to silence would not exist, “said McVicar.
Elliott told the audience that King, who represented Clayton Weatherston - the man convicted of murdering his daughter -, was the only person who talked to him and his wife, Lesley, through their trial.
"The prosecution ... just ignored us.”

Peter’s Comment

Before the right to silence became law in most civilized countries many innocent people were convicted solely because of their inability to foot it with high-powered prosecutors.

It meant that the police could always get a conviction when the pressure was on them to solve a case. All they had to do was go out and arrest any pathetic specimen who couldn't defend himself. And they did.

Isn’t it better that they should not bring a charge until they have enough stand alone evidence to convince a jury?

Exposing accused people to the peril of inadvertent self incrimination is tantamount to having a law that demands that households leave doors open so that burglars have easy access.

Police and prosecutors, given the chance, will prey on people who are vulnerable. 







Saturday, July 21, 2012

GUN LAWS AND MURDER RATES


America Is a Violent Country
JUL 20TH, 2012  From Kieran Healy  http://www.kieranhealy.org/blog/


The terrible events in Colorado this morning prompted me to update a post about comparative death rates from assault across different societies. The following figures are from the OECD for deaths due to assault per 100,000 population from 1960 to the present. As before, the most striking features of the data are (1) how much more violent the U.S. is than other OECD countries (except possibly Estonia and Mexico, not shown here), and (2) the degree of change—and recently, decline—there has been in the U.S. time series considered by itself. Note that “assault” as a cause of death does not distinguish the mechanism of death (gunshot, stabbing, etc.). If anyone knows of a similar time series for homicides specifically, let me know.

Peter’s Comment

The difference is guns. America has one of the easiest accesses to guns laws in the world.

Americans buy guns for protection but it rarely works out that way.

A typical ratio of gun murders to total murders in most countries is less than 50% involving guns. The USA has a similar rate of non-gun murders. However, because of easy access to guns the statistics show that the higher overall murder rate is attributed entirely to guns.

Think about the countless mass shootings. What other murder means could render such horrendous statistics? Strangulation, stabbing, bashing? Could any of those means take a toll of dozens of lives in minutes the way shooting can?

America has a high murder rate because too many people buy guns for protection and others buy guns because they a military nutters.

Here in New Zealand our murder rate is low and getting lower. We have laws which impose very tight controls on sporting weapons and it is virtually impossible to get a firearm for any other purpose. Even our police don’t carry guns except in special circumstances.

America, get rid of your guns and your country will be safer.

BEYOND THE SEAS

This is my latest historical novel  Beyond the Seas When twelve-year-old orphan Nathaniel Asker is shipped from the back alleys of London to...